GDP was actually revised DOWN not Up
As the Telegraph reports, the GDP for Q4 2009 was this morning actually revised DOWN, yes DOWN.
However because it was actually an increase of 0.3 % on the revised DOWN value of earlier quarters in 2009 it appeared to be going up.
Initially the ONS thought GDP was £315,845m, it was in fact £315,712m (of course this is still an estimate). This means the GDP was re-estimated DOWN 133m.
Why did the headline figure say it was 0.3% up an increase from 0.1%, well it turns out that earlier quarters have been revised DOWN as well. So the GDP increased in percentage figures over Q3 2009. It also means we were in an even deeper recession than was thought.
Confused read the article in the Telegraph that tells it much better than I can.
Of course all this leads us to reflect that this is yet again Brown trying to pull the wool over our eyes. Earlier on today I noted that Fraser Nelson in the Spectator was showing us how Gordon Brown was trying to confuse us over deficit an debt, now they are trying to show a decrease as an increase.
The last words in the Telegraph article also note why we need to consider what the next real set of figures will show.
And just to add to our worries, a brief examination of the GDP figures (which are now more than three-quarters complete, so are pretty reliable), much of the growth (such as it was) was provided by retail, by car manufacture and sales, and by government expenditutre. It doesn’t take an economic genius to realise that these are all reliant on artificial props from the government (VAT cut, car scrappage scheme, brought-forward state spending) which will soon be, or have already been, withdrawn.
No wonder Alistair Darling was reluctant to spend much time basking in the apparent glory of these figures this morning. They are, I would say, more bad news than good.
Methinks it is Time for a Change
Don’t be fooled: GDP was actually revised down – Telegraph Blogs.









Recent Comments